Friday, December 30, 2022

35. The King's Son marked for death

[Life of Christ] [Previous] [Next]

Tuesday of the week in which He died, Our Lord told one of His last parables which tied up the prophecies of the Old Testament and pointed to what would happen to Him within seventy-two hours. The temple rulers had just been questioning Our Lord concerning His authority. The position that they took was that they were representatives and guardians of the people; therefore, they must prevent the people from being misled. Our Lord answered them in a parable showing them the kind of guardians and guides they were.


There was a man who planted a vineyard,

And put a wall round it,

And dug a winepress and built a tower in it.

MARK 12:1


The One Who planted the vineyard was God Himself, as His listeners already knew from reading the first few verses of the fifth chapter of Isaias. The wall that He put around it was a wall that separated them from the idolatrous nations of the Gentiles and allowed God to tend His fruitful vine, Israel, with special care. The winepress, which was hollowed out of rock, had some reference to the temple services and sacrifice. The tower whose purpose was the watching and the guarding of the vineyard symbolized the special vigilance God exercised over His people.


And then let it out to some vine-dressers.

MARK 12:1


This meant the commitment of responsibility to His own people who were so guarded from pagan infection. This commitment began with Abraham when he was called out of the land of Ur, and with Moses, who gave his people commandments and the laws of worshiping the true God. As God had said through His prophet Jeremias:


Early I sent them to your doors,

The prophets that were servants of Mine.

JEREMIAS 35:15


From that moment on, the vineyard of Israel should have given to God the fruits of fidelity and love proportionate to the blessings they had received. But when the owner of the vineyard sent three of his servants successively to gather fruits, they were maltreated by the vine-dressers. What these divine messengers, or prophets, suffered is described in the eleventh chapter of Hebrews. St. Stephen, the first martyr, later on would describe the infidelity of the people to the prophets.


There was not one of the prophets they did not persecute;

It was death to foretell the coming of that Just Man,

Whom you in these times have betrayed and murdered.

ACTS 7:52


But God’s love was not wearied out with the cruelty of the vine-dressers. There were fresh calls to repentance after each new act of violence.


And he sent other servants on a second errand,

More than he had sent at first,

But they were used no better.

MATTHEW 21:36


According to Mark, some were beaten over the head and used outrageously, and others killed, which signified the climax of iniquity. These statements are general, but they could nevertheless refer to the beating which was given to Jeremias and the killing of Isaias.


So the owner of the vineyard said,

What am I to do?

I will send my well-beloved Son;

Perhaps they will have reverence for Him.

LUKE 20:13


God is represented as soliloquizing with Himself as if to throw His love in clearer light. What more could He do for His vineyard than He had done? The “perhaps” was not only a doubt that the Divine Son would be accepted, but also an expectation that He would not. The history of God’s relation with a people was told in a few minutes.


Those who listened to Our Blessed Lord fully understood the many references He had made to the way of the prophets who had been set upon by the people and their message repudiated. They had also heard Him declare Himself to be the Son of God. Under the thin veil of the parable, He was answering the question, namely, by what authority He did certain things. Our Lord here not only reaffirmed the personal relationship of Himself to His Heavenly Father, but also His infinite superiority over the prophets and servants.


Then revealing to His listeners the death that He would undergo at their hands, He continues:


But when the vine-dressers found His Son coming to them,

They said among themselves, this is the heir;

Come, let us kill Him, and seize upon the inheritance.

And they laid hands on Him,

Thrust Him out from the vineyard and killed Him.

MATTHEW 21:38–38


The vine-dressers are here represented as knowing the Son and the Heir of the vineyard. With unmistakable clarity, the Lord revealed the dreadful doom He would suffer at their hands, that He would be cast “out of the vineyard” to the hill of Calvary which was outside Jerusalem, and that He was the Father’s last appeal to a sinful world. There were no illusions about the reverence that He would meet from mankind. Rebuffs and injuries and insults would be the greeting extended to the Son of the Heavenly Father.


Within three days of the telling of the story, it came true. The accredited keepers of the vineyard, such as Annas and Caiphas, cast Him out from the city on to a hill that was a dump and put Him to death. As Augustine said: “They slew Him, that they might possess, and because they slew, they lost.”


After Our Lord said that those who killed the Son would lose the inheritance, He then sent the minds of His hearers back to Sacred Scripture.


But He fastened His eyes on them, and said,

Why then, what is the meaning of those words which have been

written, the very stone which the builders rejected

Has become the chief stone at the corner?

LUKE 20:17


This was a quotation from their very familiar one hundred and seventeenth Psalm:


The very stone which the builders rejected

Has become the chief stone at the corner;

This is the Lord’s doing,

And it is marvelous in our eyes.


The Old Testament contained many prophecies concerning Our Lord as a stone. Five times Our Blessed Lord had availed Himself of the parable of the vine. Now after using the figure to indicate the cruelty to God’s only begotten Son, sent from Heaven to secure His Father’s rights, He dropped the figure altogether and took up the figure of the cornerstone. The Son of God would be the despised and rejected stone. But He foretold that He would be the stone Who would unite and bind all together.


Never is there a mention of the tragedy without the glory; so too here the evil treatment the Son received is compensated for by the ultimate victory, in which as the cornerstone He unites Jew and Gentile in one holy house. Thus the builders of His death were overruled by the Great Architect. Even their own unconscious rejection of Him made them unconscious, voluntary instruments of His purpose. Whom they refused, God would raise up as King. Under the figure of the vineyard He foretold His death; under the figure of the cornerstone, His Resurrection. He told His own fate and destiny as if it were already done and accomplished, and pointed out the futility of any opposition to Him even though they killed Him. Remarkable words they were, from a man Who said that in three days He would be crucified. And yet they revealed in clear words what they dimly knew in their own hearts. With dramatic suddenness which caught them unaware, He anticipated the judgment He said He would exercise over all men and nations on the last day. For the moment He ceased to be the Lamb and began to be the Lion of Juda. His last days are now at an end; the rulers must decide now whether they will receive Him or reject Him. He warned them that for taking His life, His Kingdom would pass to the Gentiles:


I tell you, then,

That the kingdom of God will be taken away from you,

And given to a people

Which yields the revenues that belong to it.

MATTHEW 21:43


Continuing the analogy, taken from Daniel, of the stone which grinds to powder the kingdoms of the earth, He thundered:


As for the stone, when a man falls against it,

He will break his bones;

When it falls upon him,

It will scatter him like chaff.

MATTHEW 21:44


There are two figures: one is of a man dashing himself against the stone that is laid passively on earth. Our Lord here meant rejecting Him during this time of His humiliation. The other figure is of the stone actively considered as when it falls, for example, from a cliff. By this He meant Himself as glorified and crushing all earthly opposition. The first would refer to Israel in the present moment when it rejected Him, and for which Jerusalem, He said, would be desolate. The other would refer to those who rejected Him after His glorious Resurrection, Ascension, and the progress of His Kingdom on earth.


Every man, He claimed, had some contact with Him. He is free to reject His influence, but the rejection is the stone which crushes him. No one can remain indifferent once he has met Him. He remains the perpetual element in the character of every hearer. No teacher in the world ever claimed that rejecting him would harden one’s heart and make a man worse. But here is One Who, within three days of going to His death, said that the very rejection of Him would decay the heart. Whether one believes or disbelieves Him, one is never the same afterward. Christ said that He was either the rock on which men would build the foundation of life, or the rock which would crush them. Never did men just simply pass Him by; He is the abiding Presence. Some may think that they allow Him to pass by without receiving Him, but this He called fatal neglect. A fatal crushing would follow not only neglect or indifference, but also when there was formal opposition. No teacher who ever lived told those who heard him that the rejection of his words would mean their damnation. Even those who believe that Christ was only a teacher would scruple at this judgment about receiving His message. But being primarily a Savior, the alternative was understandable. To reject the Savior was to reject Salvation, as Our Lord called Himself in the house of Zacchaeus. The questioners of His authority had no doubt of the spiritual significance of the parable and the reference to themselves. Their motives were discovered, which only exasperated more those whose designs were evil. When evil is revealed in the light, it does not always repent; sometimes it becomes more evil.


At this, the chief priests and scribes

Would gladly have laid hands on Him there and then,

But they were afraid of the people.

They saw clearly that this parable of His

Was aimed at them.

LUKE 20:19


The good repent on knowing their sin; the evil become angry when discovered. Ignorance is not the cause of evil, as Plato held; neither is education the answer to the removal of evil. These men had an intellect as well as a will; knowledge as well as intention. Truth can be known and hated; Goodness can be known and crucified. The Hour was approaching, and for the moment the fear of the people deterred the Pharisees. Violence could not be triggered against Him until He would say, “This is your Hour.”

[Life of Christ] [Previous] [Next]

No comments:

Post a Comment